You are here:

Language:

 

Vocational training experts increasingly optimistic about the future

Working and learning in the year 2020

Published: May 20, 2004
URN: urn:nbn:de:0035-0076-3

The training-place market is currently dealing with major problems. This has not however shaken the experts' confidence in the long-term ability of vocational training to remain viable in the face of the challenges of the future. Most are sure that the combination of work experience and classroom instruction will continue to be successful in the future. In fact, this optimism has even grown in recent years as a study that compares experts' views in 1997 and 2004 shows. For this study, experts were asked how they imagined vocational training would develop in the years up to 2020 (background information on the survey).

Looking at the study's findings in detail, 63 percent of the experts surveyed in 2004 (1997: 47 percent) believe that work in the year 2020 will generally be organized in such a way that it will provide direct impetus for individuals to learn new skills and develop existing skills throughout their working life (see Graph 1).

Which is why concern over a possible erosion of vocational training is on the decline. Only 27 percent (1997: 47 percent) still fear that learning under practical conditions will be increasingly replaced by the use of simulations. Only a - shrinking - minority of 30 percent (1997: 37 percent) of the experts surveyed believe that Germany's "dual" system of vocational training - which combines part-time vocational schooling with practical work experience - will be confined to the vocational trades field by the year 2020.

In fact, there is growing belief that the year 2020 will see initial and continuing vocational education and training on equal footing with other forms of education and opening the door to careers in management positions. Sixty-three percent of the experts surveyed currently hold this opinion. In 1997, only 45 percent did.

In the judgement of 55 percent of the experts surveyed (1997: 44 percent), the separation between work and learning will have largely disappeared by the year 2020 (see Graph 2). It is therefore only logical for it to be possible to obtain certification for skills acquired in the work process. Seventy-five percent expect this to be the case in the future (1997: 66 percent).
However, the growing significance of informally acquired skills does not mean that most experts expect the overall importance of formal training to decline. Only 38 percent of the experts surveyed in 2004 look for this to happen - the same proportion of respondents as in 1997. In fact, a growing number of respondents were convinced that it will be possible to earn vocational qualification abroad in 2020. Eighty-three percent (1997: 60 percent) expect there to be some form of reciprocal recognition along the lines of a credit point system by then.
Parallel to this trend, the experts participating in the survey expect to see far-reaching changes in the tasks and responsibilities of instruction personnel and the bodies and institutions providing training (see Graph 3).

Eighty-eight percent (1997: 71 per cent) believe that in the year 2020 vocational guidance will be a central task of bodies providing education and training. Seventy-three percent (1997: 62 percent) feel that the primary task of vocational instructors and trainers in the future will be to organize and moderate open learning arrangements. And 68 percent (1997: 53 percent) assume that traditional instruction at vocational schools will be superseded by project-based instruction and other practice-related forms of learning by 2020 at the latest.

Those experts who work in companies, trade chambers, inter-company vocational training facilities, schools, and government research centres are particularly certain of this. Experts from universities, universities of applied sciences and colleges of advanced vocational studies are more pessimistic about whether the division between work and learning will fade. They are also less certain that practice-oriented learning will supersede instruction in conventional vocational schools or that in-house training will acquire equal status with other forms of education (see Table 1). All in all however, the differences between the experts are relatively small. This is particularly true with respect to the marked increase in the positive attitude that occurred during the period between the two surveys. This growing optimism can be observed in all groups in the breakdown here (see Table 2). 

Background on the survey
Germany's former Federal Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Technology commissioned a Delphi study in 1997 to examine the effects of the knowledge society on education processes and structures. In the course of this "education Delphi" 669 experts were asked what education systems should be doing and how they thought education systems would develop by the year 2020. The questions revolved around general schools and the university sector. A total of 457 experts - 68 percent of the experts who had been approached as potential respondents - participated in the study.

The repeat survey conducted in the spring of 2004 was limited to eleven aspects of the vocational training system. The focus of this survey was on those aspects that the experts in the 1997 survey considered desirable but not very likely. This time 1,200 experts were contacted. A total of 939 experts - 78 percent of this group - agreed to participate in the survey.

The 2004 survey was conducted in conjunction with the Vocational Training Experts Monitor that is currently being set up. The Vocational Training Experts Monitor will be used in the future to survey experts on topical developments and problems. It is part of the Vocational Training Communications and Information System for Experts ("KIBB") that is being funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research ("BMBF") and realized in cooperation with BIBB's Needs Analyses, Training Supply and Demand Section (Section 2.1).

Authors:

  • Bettina Ehrenthal 
  • Elisabeth M. Krekel
  • Joachim Gerd Ulrich

Literature regarding Delphi studies in the vocational training field -Federal Ministry of Education and Research's Delphi on education - 1996

  • Prognos AG/Infratest Burke Sozialforschung (1998): Delphi-Befragung 1996/1998. Potentiale und Dimensionen der Wissensgesellschaft - Auswirkungen auf Bildungsprozesse und Bildungsstrukturen. Integrierter Abschlußbericht. Munich, Basel.
  • Kuwan, Helmut; Waschbüsch, Eva (1999)
    Wissensgesellschaft und Bildungssystem - Ergebnisse aus dem "Bildungs-Delphi. In: Rosenbladt, Bernhard von (Hrsg.): Bildung in der Wissensgesellschaft. Ein Werkstattbericht zum Reformbedarf im Bildungssystem. Münster: Waxmann-Verlag. S. 19-35.

Internal BIBB Delphi study on research - 1999

  • Krekel, Elisabeth M.; Ulrich, Joachim Gerd (2000)
    Die Delphi-Methode: Welche Erkenntnisse ergeben sich aus der Anwendung der Delphi-Methode für die Berufsbildungsforschung? In: Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 357-367.

National Delphi on research - 2001/2002

  • Brosi, Walter; Krekel, Elisabeth M.; Ulrich, Joachim Gerd (Hrsg.)(2003)
    Sicherung der beruflichen Zukunft durch Forschung und Entwicklung. Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann.
  • Krekel, Elisabeth M.; Ulrich, Joachim Gerd (2004)
    Bedarfsperspektiven der Berufsbildungsforschung aus der Sicht der Delphi-Studie des Bundesinstituts für Berufsbildung. In: Czycholl, Reinhard; Zedler, Reinhard (ed.):
    Stand und Perspektiven der Berufsbildungsforschung. Dokumentation des 5. Forums
    Berufsbildungsforschung 2003 an der Carl-von-Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg (BeitrAB 280). Nuremberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit (Federal Employment Agency).

     


Erscheinungsdatum und Hinweis Deutsche Nationalbibliothek

Publication on the Internet: May 20, 2004

URN: urn:nbn:de:0035-0076-3

Die Deutsche Bibliothek has archived the electronic publication "Vocational training experts increasingly optimistic obout the future", which is now permanently available on the archive server of Die Deutsche Bibliothek.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons LicenseContent on this page is licensed under the Creative Commons License "Attribution: Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Germany". Further information on this is available on our Creative Commons page (de).
 

Last modified on: November 22, 2011

Share this informations:

Facebook Twitter MeinVZ

Social Bookmarks

Google Yahoo Mr. Wong  Del.icio.us Linkarena Folkd Yigg


Tools:


Publisher: Federal Institute for Vocational Training (BIBB)
The President
Robert-Schuman-Platz 3
53175 Bonn
http://www.bibb.de

Copyright: The published contents are protected by copyright.
Articles associated with the names of certain persons do not necessarily represent the opinion of the publisher.