Promoting transparency and mutual trust
There is clear survey evidence that more companies providing apprenticeship places ("training companies") would enable apprentices to complete a placement abroad if it fitted in with the specialist content of the apprenticeship, and if it could be made transparently clear what apprentices learned abroad (cf. KÖRBEL/FRIEDRICH 2011). According to a study in the automotive sector, German companies have reservations about phases of transnational mobility for apprentices, citing the lack of functioning recognition procedures, the consequent unavoidable duplication of learning and the need to catch up on missed work upon returning to part-time vocational school (cf. MoVE-iT 2007; REGLIN/SCHÖPF 2007).
What is called for is transparency and better comprehensibility of vocational competences and qualifications throughout Europe. Currently training providers and training companies still have great difficulties in comparing competences transnationally and transferring partial qualifications from one national system of initial vocational training to another. Although numerous one-off pragmatic solutions exist, in Germany has not yet been implemented a systematic approach that improves the transparency and recognition of vocational competences.
ECVET and EQF, instruments for transparency
The European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning (EQF), which acts as a reference framework and an instrument for translating qualifications, and the European Credit System in Vocational Education and Training (ECVET) for the individual recognition of prior learning have been developed as a set of tools which enable vocational competences to be described in a way that is comprehensible Europe-wide, regardless of the duration of training or the institution or context in which it took place. At the heart of this approach is the emphasis on learning outcomes, i.e. "statements of what a learner knows, understands and is able to do on completion of a learning process" (European Parliament and Council 2008). The outcomes of learning are assessed without reference to how and where the learning took place; the crucial thing is which knowledge, skills and capabilities a person has acquired. Under the EQF and ECVET, learning outcomes and the grouping of these into units of learning outcomes form the basis for the structured description of vocational qualifications. The use of the EQF as a "translation instrument" between national qualification systems enables training providers to describe units of learning outcomes in a way that is understood internationally and across education systems, allowing them to be integrated into any given national vocational education and training (VET) context.
In practice the testing of ECVET procedures, principles and instruments has been a priority for a number of years, both at European and national level, in the Leonardo da Vinci programme of the EU Lifelong Learning Programme. The European project and product database ADAM holds details of more than a hundred projects all over Europe that have meanwhile engaged with the description of learning outcomes, the tailoring of units of learning outcomes, the examination and documentation of learning outcomes and the allocation of points and transfer of learning credits (cf. www.adam-europe.eu/adam/thematicgroup/ECVET). Project results available to date show that the emphasis on competence-based learning outcomes can bring about lasting improvement to the quality of transnational training phases. Particularly in IVET it can help with aligning periods spent abroad more precisely to the structures and specialist requirements of IVET in Germany.
Building trust that learning promises will be kept
With regard to the exchange of apprentices, a further significant element comes into play, namely the necessity for mutual trust between the sending and receiving partners that "learning promises" will be kept and that learning outcomes can be verified. Prerequisites for the building of mutual trust include agreed quality assurance mechanisms and clear communication about the contents and level of the intended learning outcomes. In a Memorandum of Understanding, partners set out their procedures for quality assurance, assessment, validation and recognition as well as the awarding of credit for learning outcomes. As a key component of same document, the units of learning outcomes are defined in the form of a learning agreement.