Predictive power of school grades and recruitment tests
Correlations were calculated to determine the importance of school grades and recruitment tests in predicting an individual's performance on interim and final examinations. It should be noted in this connection that a negative correlation between the results of the recruitment test and the grades earned on an interim examination or final examination actually indicate a positive correlation because in the case of school grades, a lower numerical value stands for good performance and in the case of exams, a good result is expressed in high point values.
Table 2 Correlations between predictors and criteria
| |
Average school grade |
Grade in Mathematics |
Grade in German |
Grade in English |
Recruitment test |
| Grade on interim examination |
.412** (352)
|
.237** (310)
|
.122* (318)
|
.183** (289)
|
-.266** (402)
|
| Grade on final examination |
.442** (264)
|
.370** (205)
|
.201** (213)
|
.291** (186)
|
-.315** (302)
|
| Grade on written part of final examination |
.468** (236)
|
.355** (189)
|
.218** (196)
|
.288** (169)
|
-.312** (280)
|
| Grade on practical part of final exam |
.437** (222)
|
.330** (182)
|
.218** (189)
|
.296** (162)
|
-.143* (205)
|
** The correlation is significant at the level of 0.01 (one-tailed).
* The correlation is significant at the level of 0.05 (one-tailed).
The size of the respective sample is shown in parentheses.
Looking at Table 2, all of the correlations between school grades, the results of the recruitment test and the grades earned on the interim and final examinations are statistically significant. The closest correlations can be observed between the average school grade and the different criteria. Here, the strongest correlation of r=.468 was determined for the grade on the written part of the final examination. The individual grades in the main subjects Mathematics, German and English also exhibit significant correlations with the criteria. These correlations do not however reach the level of correlation seen for the average grade. At the same time, the individual grades consistently predict the results of the final examination better than they predict the results of the interim examination. This could be due to the fact that in some training occupations little value is attached to the interim examination and youths do not put forth a maximum effort on their interim exam. As in the meta-analysis by BARON-BOLDT/ SCHULER/FUNKE (1988), the grade in Mathematics is the best individual predictor for a trainee's subsequent performance on the examinations conducted during initial vocational training. In contrast to the findings from the meta-analysis however, this study did not find any distinct differences in the predictors' correlations with the written part of the final examination compared to their correlations with the practical part of the final exam. So in the data set used in this study, school grades predicted the two sections of the final examination equally well. The correlations between the recruitment test and the criteria for success were not as strong as they were between the average school grade and the success criteria. A slight difference in the correlation with the written part and the practical part of the final examination could be seen, with the correlation with the practical part of the final exam being markedly weaker.
The data set contained the grades not only from secondary school pupils with qualification to enter a university / university of applied sciences but also the grades of secondary school pupils who have a leaving certificate from an intermediate secondary school. Consequently, final grades must be seen in relation to the type of secondary school leaving certificate earned. In keeping with this, the correlations listed in Table 3 are broken down by the type of leaving certificate. The number of youths with a leaving certificate from a lower secondary school was too small in this data set for a separate analysis.
Table 3 Correlations between predictors and criteria, broken down by level of education
| |
Average school grade |
Grade in Mathematics |
Grade in German |
Grade in English |
Recruitment test |
| Level of education completed |
Qualification to enter a university of applied sciences |
Intermediate secondary school |
Qualification to enter a university of applied sciences |
Intermediate secondary school |
Qualification to enter a university of applied sciences |
Intermediate secondary school |
Qualification to enter a university of applied sciences |
Intermediate secondary school |
Qualification to enter a university of applied sciences |
Intermediate secondary school |
| Grade on interim exam |
.358**
(183)
|
.358**
(183)
|
.208**
(163)
|
.207**
(128)
|
.131*
(163)
|
.106
(136)
|
.248**
(157)
|
.058
(116)
|
-.203**
(225)
|
.386**
(124)
|
| Grade on final exam |
.426**
(159)
|
.470**
(94)
|
.365**
(138)
|
.388**
(66)
|
.184*
(139)
|
.253*
(73)
|
.277**
(133)
|
.289*
(52)
|
-.257**
(193)
|
.387**
(69)
|
| Grade on written part of final exam |
.443**
(141)
|
.488**
(84)
|
.365**
(131)
|
.352**
(57)
|
.231**
(131)
|
.226*
(64)
|
.276**
(125)
|
.294*
(43)
|
-.285**
(176)
|
-.320**
(66)
|
| Grade on practical part of final exam |
.455**
(127)
|
.440**
(84)
|
.332**
(123)
|
.335**
(58)
|
.195*
(123)
|
.301**
(65)
|
.275**
(117)
|
.382**
(44)
|
-.085
(122)
|
-.220
(45)
|
* The correlation is significant at the level of 0.05 (one-tailed).
** The correlation is significant at the level of 0.01 (one-tailed).
The size of the respective sample is shown in parentheses.
As Table 3 shows, some predictors exhibit marked differences depending on the type of school leaving certificate. In the case of individuals with a leaving certificate from an intermediate secondary school, the results of the recruitment test exhibit stronger correlations with the grades from both the interim examination and the final examination than they do for individuals who have earned qualification to enrol in a university / university of applied sciences. The average grade earned at school (average school grade) by youths with a school leaving certificate from an intermediate secondary school is also somewhat better at predicting how well the individual will satisfy the criteria for the success of vocational training. The degree of the correlations between the grades for the individual subjects and the criteria is for the most part comparable, with the exception of the final grades earned by intermediate secondary school pupils in the language subjects, which exhibit noticeably stronger correlations with the practical final examination than in the case of upper secondary school leavers who had earned qualification to enrol in a university (or university of applied sciences). These different correlations could conceivably be simply due to sampling errors; however social and communication skills 0 which are particularly important in the practical final examination 0 perhaps count more in the final grades in the language subjects taught in intermediate secondary school.
As the results listed in Table 2 and Table 3 show, later performance on vocational training examinations can be predicted not only on the basis of the recruitment test but also on the basis of the final grades earned in secondary school. Here, the average grade from secondary school has the most predictive power for upper secondary school leavers with qualification to enrol in a university (or university of applied sciences) as well as for pupils with a school leaving certificate from an intermediate secondary school. This raises the question whether recruitment tests provide enterprises information that supplements the average grade earned in school and offers an additional means for ensuring that they choose appropriate applicants. To test this, hierarchical regressions were calculated for the grade earned on the interim examination and on the final examination. In the first step of this calculation, only the average grade earned in school was included. In a further step the calculation used the average grade together with the results from the recruitment test. As can be seen in Table 4, R2 =17.8 per cent (p<.01) of the variance of the grade from the interim exam can be explained by the average grade earned in secondary school. A further 6.1 percentage points of the variance can be explained through the addition of the recruitment test which improves the reliability of the prediction. The situation is similar with the prediction of the grade on the final examination (Table 5). In this case, R2 =16.1 per cent (p<.01) of the variance can be explained by the average school grade alone. Adding the recruitment test increases this by a further 7.6 percentage points. Therefore, in both cases the recruitment test can contribute to a somewhat greater degree of certainty regarding the soundness of recruitment decisions.
Table 4 Hierarchical regression for the prediction of the grade on the interim examination
