You are here:

Language:

 

CVTS 3-Evaluation and interpretation of the third European Continuing Vocational Training Survey

Evaluation and interpretation of the third European Continuing Vocational Training Survey (CVTS3) Short title: CVTS3-Eva

In keeping with the specifications of the Cedefop call for proposals, this project will examine and analyse for the first time the CVTS3 findings tables that have been successively published by Eurostat since October 2007. The main emphasis of the project will be on providing an explanatory description of the European findings. Depending on the possibilities available during the project for accessing national quality reports regarding the survey and for accessing microdata (before and after imputation), in-depth and explanatory analyses will also be conducted.

The project is divided into three 'work packages':

  • WP 1: Evaluation and assessment of the quality of the CVTS 3 data
  • WP 2: Context and structure of continuing vocational training measures in enterprises
  • WP 3: Costs and financing of continuing vocational training in enterprises

Reports (in German)

Top of the page

Experts

Top of the page

Literature (not all in English)

Cedefop (ed.)
Employer-provided vocational training in Europe - Evaluation and interpretation of the third continuing vocational training survey
Luxembourg 2010

The European continuing vocational training survey (CVTS) is a unique source of internationally comparable data on training in enterprises. This report provides the first European detailed comparative analysis of the results of the third survey (CVTS3, 2005). The study was prepared on behalf of Cedefop by BIBB in cooperation with Céreq (Marseille) and Isfol (Rome).

Top of the page

Related subjects

Top of the page

Last modified on: 01.03.2011


Tools:


Publisher: Federal Institute for Vocational Training (BIBB)
The President
Robert-Schuman-Platz 3
53175 Bonn
http://www.bibb.de

Copyright: The published contents are protected by copyright.
Articles associated with the names of certain persons do not necessarily represent the opinion of the publisher.