You are here:

Language:

 

ReferNet

ReferNet - European network for professional information and expertise

ReferNet publications offer a wide variety of information on the vocational education and training (VET) systems in individual European countries.
Established by CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training) in 2002, ReferNet is a European information network for vocational education and training. ReferNet consortia, in which institutions and organisations of relevance in VET are represented, work in the 27 EU Member States, Norway and Iceland. The Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB) is responsible for national coordination in Germany. The main task in this connection is to inject greater transparency into national vocational training systems through coordinated analysis reports.
CEDEFOP publications include:

 

  • Spotlight on VET Germany 
  • POLICY REPORT 2010
    This Policy Report provides information on progress in VET towards EU policy goals within the framework of the Copenhagen process and according to the policy priorities defined. It considers measures taken in the context oft he Education and Training 2010 programme since the Copenhagen Declaration.
  • COUNTRY REPORT 2011
    offers a general survey of VET systems in the individual European countries. The Country Report is updated annually.
  • RESEARCH REPORT 2009
    provides insights into the VET research landscape in Europe. The current report for Germany examines the following topics:
    • Benefits of VET
    • Mobility and migration
    • Effectiveness and quality assurance
    • Transitions

Articles

    Top of the page

    BIBB publications

    • Neues aus Europa
      Information Service with articles on political plans, strategic actions and not least 'hybrids' in Europe.
      Editor: Ute Hippach-Schneider

    Top of the page

    Lectures, presentations, materials

    • Spotlight on VET Germany
    • Policy Report 2010
      Ute Hippach-Schneider, Bernadette Toth (Eds.)
    • Country Report 2011
      Ute Hippach-Schneider; Kristina Alice Hensen (Eds.)
    • Policy Report 2008
      Ute Hippach-Schneider, Christian Woll Georg Hanf
    • Blickpunkt Berufsbildung Deutschland 2012
    • Spotlight on VET Germany
    • ReferNet Germany - Research Report 2009
      Susanne Berger, Prof. Dr. Sandra Bohlinger, Prof. Dr. Dietmar Frommberger, Prof. Dr. Matthias Pilz, Dr. Ingrid Wilkens
      What is occupying the "vocational education and training researchers" of a country? Is there any research of note? Which topics are being investigated and processed? Which relevant issues and material results are emerging?
    • ReferNet-Country Report 2009
      Ute Hippach-Schneider, Karen Schober (Chapter 8), Bernadette Toth und Christian Woll
      The Report is a updated version of the Thematic Overview 2008 and provides again basic information on Germany0s VET system. According to political and economic developments there have been slight changes in structure and chapters. In this issue there is a new subchapter about "Possible projections of the financial crisis on VET policies" as well about VET statistics.
    • Thematic Overview - Germany 2008
      Ute Hippach-Schneider, Christian Woll
      The German vocational education and training (VET) system
      6th edition, September 2008
    • ReferNet Country Report Germany 2008
      Ute Hippach-Schneider, Christian Woll, Georg Hanf
      Progress in the policy priority areas for vocational education and training

    Top of the page

    Reports (in German)

    Top of the page

    Portals and databases

    Top of the page

    Experts

    Top of the page

    Treffer aus der Literaturdatenbank: 

    Alle anzeigen

    Top of the page

    Last modified on: 11.12.2012


    Tools:


    Publisher: Federal Institute for Vocational Training (BIBB)
    The President
    Robert-Schuman-Platz 3
    53175 Bonn
    http://www.bibb.de

    Copyright: The published contents are protected by copyright.
    Articles associated with the names of certain persons do not necessarily represent the opinion of the publisher.